The FINANCIAL — The European Commission managed its 2013 EU budget funds according to the rules, so Parliament should grant it a “discharge” (approval) for that year, said the Budgetary Control Committee on March 24.
MEPs nonetheless criticised high administrative error rates in agriculture, regional and employment policy spending, which is managed mainly by EU member states. Parliament’s own management of EU funds in 2013 was also approved, in a separate vote.
On March 23, the committee postponed discharge to an EU agency and four EU-private new technology partnerships. Find more on Monday’s votes here.
Agriculture, regional and employment spending errors
MEPs stated reservations about how the European Commission and member states managed EU funding for agricultural, regional and employment policies in 2013, citing a lack of proper checks.
While the Commission is legally responsible for expenditure overall, about 80% of all EU funding is in fact managed and paid locally by member states and their authorities. This spending is later reimbursed by the EU.
The estimated error rates – the percentage of payments in which administrative mistakes were made – were 5.2% for funds managed by the member states and 3.7% for the Commission. Both rates were well above the 2% threshold beneath which the European Court of Auditors could classify payments as error-free.
The most frequent errors were a disregard for rules on eligibility for support and faulty public procurement procedures.
“Use it or lose it”
High error rates in member states stem from ineffective checks and a “use it or lose it” attitude, in which spending EU funds becomes the main objective, observed MEPs.
“Member states seem to be less scrupulous when spending EU funds compared to the way they spend their national budget”, says the report, listing the worst-scoring countries on error counts in each policy area. The Commission should focus less on ensuring that EU funds get spent, and more on what they actually achieve, recommended the committee.
As faulty local data distort the picture of how EU funds are spent, MEPs called for sanctions against incorrect or false member state reporting.
Foreign aid doubts
MEPs criticised a series of Commission decisions in the foreign affairs field. These included delivering EU aid without recourse to public tenders, via organisations that might not have been qualified for such work. Others prompted allegations of embezzlement of EU aid to the refugee camp in Tindouf, Algeria and a payroll fraud in Ghana.
Parliament requests report on Juncker Plan
MEPs asked the Commission to submit a report next year on how well the €315 billion “Juncker” investment plan has worked in creating jobs and growth.
European Parliament
Spending by the European Parliament in 2013 was approved on March 24.
Discussion about this post