Ottawa, Canada – In a stunning turnaround, Prime Minister Mark Carney’s Liberal Party secured victory in Canada’s federal election on April 28, 2025, edging out Pierre Poilievre’s Conservative Party in a race reshaped by U.S. President Donald Trump’s trade war and annexation threats. Canadian and U.S. media reports project the Liberals will form a minority government, falling short of the 172 seats needed for a majority in the 343-seat House of Commons.
The election, described as a referendum on Canada’s response to Trump’s aggressive rhetoric, saw a surge in nationalism that bolstered the Liberals while devastating smaller parties. This article examines the election results, the U.S. administration’s influence, and the alignment of Canadian parties with or against Trump’s ideology, drawing on reports from both Canadian and U.S. media.
Election Results: A Liberal Comeback Fueled by Anti-Trump Sentiment
The Liberal Party, led by political newcomer Mark Carney, a former Bank of Canada and Bank of England governor, won approximately 161 seats, with the Conservatives trailing at around 150, according to Reuters and CBC projections. The final seat count, particularly in British Columbia, remains pending, but CTV News confirmed the Liberals’ edge, capping a remarkable recovery from a 20-point polling deficit in January 2025. Carney’s victory speech in Ottawa emphasized unity against Trump, declaring, “President Trump is trying to break us so America can own us. That will never happen.”
The Conservatives, led by Poilievre, conceded defeat, with Poilievre vowing to “hold the government to account” while acknowledging “hard lessons” from the loss. His own seat in Carleton, Ontario, remains in doubt, trailing Liberal Bruce Fanjoy by 2.7%. Smaller parties faced catastrophic losses: the New Democratic Party (NDP), led by Jagmeet Singh, plummeted to below the 12 seats needed for official party status, prompting Singh’s resignation after losing his British Columbia seat. The Bloc Québécois and Green Party also struggled, with Green co-leader Jonathan Pedneault failing to win a seat, though Elizabeth May retained hers.
Canadian media, including CBC and CTV, highlighted the election’s historic voter turnout, with over 7.3 million advance ballots cast, a 25% increase from previous records. U.S. media, such as The New York Times and The Washington Post, framed the Liberal win as a rejection of Trump’s influence, noting Carney’s appeal as a steady leader to counter U.S. threats.
U.S. Administration’s Influence: Trump as the Election’s Defining Force
The Trump administration’s aggressive rhetoric and policies fundamentally altered the 2025 Canadian election, transforming it into a contest over who could best stand up to the U.S. president. Trump’s 25% tariffs on Canadian steel, aluminum, and autos, coupled with repeated threats to annex Canada as the “51st state,” sparked a wave of nationalism that upended the political landscape.
A POLITICO/Focaldata poll found 39% of Canadians cited Trump as a top concern, second only to the cost of living at 60%. An Ipsos poll from March 20, 2025, showed 41% trusted Carney to handle Trump, compared to 31% for Poilievre, with 43% believing Poilievre would “roll over” to Trump’s demands.
Canadian media, such as CBC, reported that Trump’s tariffs and annexation barbs, including a social media post on election day claiming Canada should join the U.S., fueled patriotic sentiment that rallied voters to the Liberals. The Washington Post noted that Trump’s actions, including a Time magazine interview on April 25, 2025, reiterating annexation, turned the election into a reflection on Canadian identity. Posts on X echoed this, with users like @ianbremmer
noting that Trump’s “51st state nonsense unified Canadians against the U.S.,” undermining Poilievre’s campaign.
U.S. media, including Axios and POLITICO, emphasized how Trump’s policies shifted voter priorities. A YouGov poll in March 2025 found nearly half of Canadians ranked U.S.-Canada relations as their top concern, surpassing housing and affordability, which had dominated earlier. The New York Times highlighted Alberta Premier Danielle Smith’s pro-Trump stance as divisive, alienating voters outside her conservative base. The Trump effect eroded the Conservatives’ 25-point lead from January, as voters feared Poilievre’s populist rhetoric aligned too closely with Trump’s.
Pro-Trumpist vs. Anti-Trump Parties in Canada
Pro-Trumpist Leanings: Conservative Party and Regional Figures
The Conservative Party, led by Poilievre, has been labeled by critics as having pro-Trumpist tendencies due to its populist rhetoric and policy overlaps with Trump’s agenda. Poilievre’s “Canada First” slogan, focus on stronger borders, budget cuts, and opposition to “woke ideology” mirrored Trump’s talking points, earning him the moniker “Trump lite” from rivals.
NPR reported that Poilievre’s messaging on migration and economic nationalism resonated with young male voters, particularly Generation Z, but alienated others wary of Trump’s influence. Alberta Premier Danielle Smith, a MAGA-aligned conservative, openly admired Trump, focusing on oil exports and regional interests, which further tied the Conservatives to Trumpism in the public eye.
However, Poilievre distanced himself from Trump during the campaign, slamming annexation threats and supporting reciprocal tariffs, insisting, “I am not MAGA.” Despite this, a POLITICO/Focaldata poll showed 40% of Conservative voters viewed the U.S. as an ally, compared to just 19% of Liberals, indicating a less hostile stance toward Trump’s America among the Conservative base. The Conservatives’ failure to clearly articulate a Trump strategy, as noted by Zain Mohyuddin in UK in a Changing Europe, cost them votes as Canadians prioritized sovereignty.
Anti-Trump Parties: Liberals, NDP, Bloc Québécois, and Greens
The Liberal Party, under Carney, positioned itself as the staunchest opponent of Trump, capitalizing on his threats to rally patriotic voters. Carney’s campaign emphasized economic resilience, proposing a $2 billion strategic response fund to protect the auto industry and reduce U.S. reliance, which 75% of Canadian exports depend on. His victory speech accused Trump of wanting Canada’s “land, resources, and water,” promising to negotiate as a “sovereign nation.”
The Liberals gained support from NDP and Bloc Québécois voters, who saw Carney as the best defense against Trump, with 53% of Liberal voters citing Trump as a major influence on their vote.
The NDP, led by Singh, and the Greens, co-led by Elizabeth May, opposed Trump’s policies, advocating retaliatory tariffs and alliances with other democracies. The NDP proposed redirecting tariff revenue to support workers in industries like auto and steel, while the Greens suggested barring Trump from the G7 summit and boosting international organizations to counter U.S. cuts. However, both parties suffered as voters strategically backed the Liberals to block a Conservative win.
The Bloc Québécois, a Quebec sovereigntist party, paradoxically rallied behind the Liberals to protect Canadian sovereignty, with voters arguing, “Quebec cannot become a sovereign nation if Canada is not a sovereign nation.” The Bloc supported wage subsidies and local procurement to counter Trump’s tariffs but lost seats as patriotic sentiment favored Carney.
Broader Implications
The 2025 election, as reported by CBC and The Guardian, was a historic contest defined by external threats rather than domestic policy. Carney’s minority government faces challenges navigating Trump’s trade war, with Reuters noting his need for support from smaller parties to pass legislation. U.S. media, like The Independent, underscored Carney’s pledge to build “the strongest economy in the G7” despite tariffs, while Canadian media emphasized national unity as a bulwark against U.S. pressure.
The Trump administration’s influence not only handed the Liberals an unexpected victory but also exposed deep divisions in Canadian politics. The Conservatives’ populist shift, while appealing to some, alienated voters fearful of Trumpism, as noted in posts on X. As Carney prepares to meet Trump, his government must balance economic retaliation with diplomacy, a task made harder by a fractured parliament and a polarized electorate.
For ongoing coverage, follow CBC News, CTV News, or U.S. outlets like The New York Times and POLITICO.
Discussion about this post