The FINANCIAL — Recent regulatory changes may undermine the concept of pay for performance and perpetuate an un-level playing field within the international financial sector, according to a new report by Mercer. The issue is of particular concern to European banks which are subject to more onerous regulatory requirements compared to competitors in North America and the Emerging Markets.
One of the most telling findings from this study was that most companies (68%) had not yet set a fixed/variable compensation ratio cap, and many indicated it was not on their agenda, albeit prior to the finalization of CRD IV requirements. Organizations in Europe were thinking about it more than other geographies, but setting such a ratio still represents major change and many challenges for these companies to manage, according to Mercer LLC.
Seventy-six per cent of organisations stated that the proposed requirements were creating an un-level playing field and only 22% said that their organisation would benefit competitively. Sixty-three per cent said that the proposed compensation caps will reduce the organisation’s ability to pay for performance and 53% believed that they would maintain total compensation levels, regardless of the level of bonus cap. Unsurprisingly then, 75% of companies were looking at creative compensation alternatives. Interestingly, 70% said that that there would be a shifting focus from compensation to other elements of the total employee value proposition (e.g. flexible working arrangements, training and career development), according to the report.
“Since bringing new talent into the organization is becoming more costly due to higher fixed salaries and larger amounts of deferred compensation, many companies are increasingly focusing on programs to engage and develop existing talent,” said Mark Quinn, Mercer Partner and UK Rewards Leader.
While European organisations will begin preparing for CRD IV changes in 2013, the most impactful changes will be for the 2014 performance year. Respondents indicated that they will respond by raising base salaries for impacted employees as well as raising allowances and non-core compensation, according to the report. Companies may also increase the vesting period for deferred compensation to five years and/or introduce new long term incentive programs to take advantage of the discount CRD IV allows for this longer vesting on 25% of variable pay. There has also been some recognition that it is important to provide forward-looking long-term incentives for the executive management team beyond a pure annual bonus deferral program. This will help maintain a consistent focus on the long-term success of the company. For example, if there are no bonuses or significantly reduced annual bonuses awarded, then there is nothing to defer over the long-term.
US regulators in particular are working with the largest banks to ensure pay practices are aligned with the FSB principles, and have resisted “one size fits all” solutions. North American companies expect less be impact from EU regulation than counterparts in Europe even though their EU-based material risk-takers will be covered by the same requirements., according to Mercer. As in Europe, the main response in this region is to raise base salaries, allowances and non-core compensation for those employees touched by the CRD IV regulation. Mercer has observed that US banks are also reducing their maximum payout ranges in their corporate incentive programs, thereby reducing the leverage in their plans.
The approach on regulating executive pay in Asia has been predominently principles-based, providing guidelines rather than instructions. Like North America, companies expect to be affected much less by the regulation. It is notable that in 2013 few expect to do much more than raise base salaries. More activity in the Emerging Markets is expected in 2014 where using carried interest incentive programs is of particular interest, according to Mercer.
Discussion about this post