The FINANCIAL -- Merseyside Police is piloting a new learning tool developed by University of Liverpool that should help officers provide an improved service for victims of the complex new coercive control law.
The tool could be used as a face-to-face training aid or adapted as an online resource and will be made available to other interested police forces and appropriate agencies.
It is based on the findings of a research project led by Lancaster University’s Dr Charlotte Barlow, Professor Sandra Walklate from the University of Liverpool’s Department of Sociology, Social Policy and Criminology and Lancaster University’s Dr Kelly Johnson, as part of the N8 Policing Research Partnership (N8PRP). The tool provides training and guidance to help officers at all ranks to understand, respond to, investigate and evidence coercive control.
Controlling and/or coercive behaviour in intimate or family relationships became a new criminal offence in England and Wales under Section 76 of the Serious Crime Act in December 2015, making it illegal to engage in a pattern of abusive behaviour; such as intimidation, control, humiliation and degradation used to harm, punish, or frighten the victim (behaviours that were technically not criminalised before).
The project, Policing Responses to Coercive Control provides important insights into how that legislation is working and its findings carry significant implications for the policing of coercive control across England and Wales.
It is the first evidence-based research to look in detail at the implementation of the legislation on coercive control.
The research, the first of its kind and funded by the N8PRP, reveals that, of the 19,000 domestic-abuse related crimes recorded by Merseyside Police over 18 months, only 156 were listed under new coercive control offences.
The research also shows:
95% of victims were women and perpetrators were much more likely to be men, highlighting the gendered nature of this offence
Victims rarely contacted the police specifically to report coercive control. The crime of coercive control often became apparent as a result of other offences (such as assault or criminal damage) being reported to the police.
Compared to other cases of domestic abuse-related crimes, emergency and other calls for help with coercive control cases were given a lower priority grading by call handlers.
Coercive control cases were also less likely to lead to an arrest or be solved in comparison to other forms of domestic abuse (such as ABH)
Findings also suggested that there were possible missed opportunities for using the coercive control offence.
When analysing a random sample of other domestic abuse crimes, 87% of the sample analysed could have been recorded as a crime of coercive control, because of the types of behaviour present (such as patterned abuse and control).
A significant number of coercive control cases faced no further action because of ‘evidential issues’.
Chief Inspector Chris Gibson said: “The recent introduction of coercive control legislation provides police forces with an opportunity to protect victims who experience a spectrum of abusive behaviour. But in order to enforce the law as effectively as possible, we must encourage victims to recognise coercive behaviour and report it to police, and ensure we as police forces are equipped to spot and deal with the signs as soon as possible.