The FINANCIAL — On July 22, Biogen announced new results from a prespecified interim analysis of PRIME, the Phase 1b placebo-controlled study of aducanumab in patients with prodromal or mild Alzheimer’s disease (AD). In this analysis, which includes patients treated up to 54 weeks with the 6 mg/kg dose, aducanumab demonstrated acceptable safety and tolerability, and the findings reinforce the previously reported results from PRIME. These data are being presented today at the Alzheimer’s Association International Conference 2015 in Washington, D.C.
Consistent with previously reported results, the 54-week data from the 6 mg/kg arm demonstrated a statistically significant reduction of beta amyloid in the brain. In exploratory analyses, the 6 mg/kg dose showed an improvement in the slowing of clinical decline, as measured by the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Clinical Dementia Rating sum of boxes (CDR-SB) scales, which was not statistically significant. In a pre-specified analysis across placebo and all doses of aducanumab, the slowing of clinical decline was shown to be dose-dependent, and this dose-dependence achieved statistical significance for both scales, according to Biogen.
“We are encouraged by these new results, which continue to show that treatment of prodromal and mild Alzheimer’s disease patients with aducanumab resulted in a statistically significant, dose-dependent reduction in amyloid plaque, as well as a dose-dependent slowing of cognitive decline,” said Alfred Sandrock, M.D., Ph.D., group senior vice president and chief medical officer at Biogen. “We have begun screening patients for our Phase 3 clinical trials. The results of the PRIME study give us hope that aducanumab may one day make a meaningful difference for people with Alzheimer’s disease.”
PRIME Study
PRIME is an ongoing Phase 1b randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple-dose study evaluating the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD) and clinical effects of aducanumab in patients with prodromal or mild AD. The PRIME study includes fixed dosing at 1 (n=31), 3 (n=33), 6 (n=30) and 10 (n=32) mg/kg, as well as placebo (n=40). In addition there is an ongoing titration regimen.
The previously reported results from the 1, 3, and 10 mg/kg arms showed dose- and time-dependent effects on the reduction of beta amyloid and slowing of clinical decline (as measured by MMSE and CDR-SB) compared to placebo at 54 weeks. In the same analysis, the 26-week results were available for the 6 mg/kg arm, which was shown to reduce amyloid plaque compared to placebo.
The new analysis presented at AAIC 2015 includes data from the 6 mg/kg dose arm and its corresponding placebo arm (n=10) up to 54 weeks. The updated results from all other fixed doses (1, 3 and 10 mg/kg) reflect a larger pooled placebo group (n=40), which now includes the placebo patients from 6 mg/kg cohort, per the prespecified statistical model.
Radiologic Results for Amyloid Plaque
PET imaging using the radiotracer florbetapir1, which binds to amyloid plaque, was used to measure plaque levels in the brain. In the updated analysis, the standardized uptake value ratio2 was virtually unchanged in the placebo group at 54 weeks. A statistically significant reduction of amyloid plaque was observed in the 3 mg/kg [-0.135 (p<0.001)], 6 mg/kg [-0.210 (p<0.001)] and 10 mg/kg [-0.268 (p<0.001)] arms. The reduction of amyloid plaque in the 1 mg/kg (-0.055) arm was not statistically significant.
Clinical Results
The updated results of the MMSE showed that patients in the placebo group worsened by an average of 2.81 points at 52 weeks. Clinical decline on the MMSE in the treatment arms was 2.18 points in the 1 mg/kg, 0.70 in the 3 mg/kg, 1.96 in the 6 mg/kg and 0.56 in the 10 mg/kg.
Relative to placebo, the 3 and 10 mg/kg doses demonstrated a statistically significant slowing of cognitive decline on the MMSE, both with p-values <0.05. The 1 and 6 mg/kg were not statistically significant. The linear trend for dose response was statistically significant with a p-value less than 0.05.
The updated results of the CDR-SB showed that patients in the placebo group worsened by an average of 1.87 points at 54 weeks compared to 1.72 in the 1 mg/kg, 1.37 in the 3 mg/kg, 1.11 in the 6 mg/kg and 0.63 in the 10 mg/kg treatment arm.
The 10 mg/kg arm demonstrated a statistically significant slowing of clinical decline compared to placebo on the CDR-SB with p-value <0.05. The 1, 3 and 6 mg/kg were not statistically significant. The linear trend for dose response was statistically significant with a p-value less than 0.05.
Pharmacokinetic activity and exposure were linear with dose. Treatment-emergent immunogenicity, which occurred in three percent of aducanumab treated patients, was transient and without an apparent effect on aducanumab PK.
Safety Results
Aducanumab demonstrated an acceptable safety and tolerability profile in this analysis that was consistent with previously reported analyses from this study. The most frequently reported treatment-related serious adverse event (SAE) and adverse event (AE) was ARIA (amyloid-related imaging abnormalities).
Based on MRI scans, the incidence of ARIA-E (edema) was dose- and apolipoprotein E4- (ApoE4) status-dependent. In general, the onset of ARIA-E was observed early in the course of treatment and was asymptomatic or with mild, transient symptoms. The majority of patients with ARIA-E continued treatment at a lower dose.
In ApoE4 carriers, the incidence of ARIA-E was 5 percent in the 1 mg/kg and 3 mg/kg arms, 43 percent in the 6 mg/kg arm and 55 percent in the 10 mg/kg arm. In ApoE4 non-carriers, the incidence of ARIA-E was 9 percent in the 3 mg/kg, 22 percent in the 6 mg/kg and 17 percent in the 10 mg/kg aducanumab arm; no cases were reported in the 1 mg/kg arm.
In ApoE4 carriers, the incidence of patients who developed ARIA-E and discontinued treatment was 5 percent in the 1 mg/kg arm, 10 percent in the 6 mg/kg arm and 35 percent in the 10 mg/kg arm. There were no discontinuations in the 3 mg/kg arm. In ApoE4 non-carriers, the incidence of patients who developed ARIA-E and discontinued treatment was 11 percent in the 6 mg/kg arm and 8 percent in the 10 mg/kg arm. There were no discontinuations in the 1 mg/kg and 3 mg/kg arms. Overall, 56 percent of subjects who developed ARIA-E continued treatment at the same or lower dose and none developed recurrent ARIA-E.
Headache occurred in 20 percent of patients receiving aducanumab compared to 5 percent in the placebo groups and appeared to be dose-dependent. Three deaths were reported in the time period of this analysis, two in the placebo group and one in the 10 mg/kg study arm; none were considered to be treatment related. Other AEs and SAEs were consistent with what is typically observed in the study population.
Discussion about this post