The May 2024 resignation of Xponential Fitness (NYSE:XPOF) Founder and CEO Anthony Geisler has prompted Toronto-based Optimist Fund to completely divest its position in the fitness franchise company. The fund’s Chief Investment Officer Jordan McNamee explicitly cited Geisler’s leadership as “the cornerstone” of their investment thesis, highlighting how founder departures can fundamentally alter institutional investment decisions.
Optimist Fund’s exit from Xponential followed Anthony Geisler‘s resignation. Analysts responded cautiously, with Baird cutting its price target on XPOF from $14 to $10 while maintaining a Neutral rating. The stock experienced significant volatility following the announcement, having already fallen approximately 74% from its peak a year earlier.
“Increased uncertainties” stemming from the CEO’s departure were cited by multiple analysts who adopted a wait-and-see stance, despite noting that Xponential’s membership count hit an all-time high in April 2024, in advance of Geisler’s departure.
Broader Pattern of CEO Departures Affecting Investor Confidence
Geisler’s exit from Xponential represents just one example in a growing pattern of leadership changes reshaping investor decisions across various sectors. Recent data shows that CEO transitions can trigger immediate and sometimes severe market reactions, causing institutional investors to reassess their positions.
In early March 2025, Kroger (NYSE:KR) CEO and Chairman Rodney McMullen resigned following a board investigation into personal conduct violations, leading to a 1.5% decline in the company’s stock price. This relatively modest drop reflected mixed investor sentiment – disappointment in the circumstances but recognition that new leadership might be needed.
A more dramatic example occurred in December 2024 when Stellantis (NYSE:STLA) CEO Carlos Tavares resigned unexpectedly, causing the company’s stock to plummet 8.5% to a two-year low. The significant decline highlighted investor concerns about the automotive giant’s turnaround plans and the challenges facing any incoming leadership.
Similarly, Dave & Buster’s Entertainment (NASDAQ:PLAY) experienced a 16% stock drop in January 2025 when CEO Chris Morris resigned amid larger-than-expected third-quarter losses. The substantial decline reflected heightened uncertainty about the company’s strategic direction without Morris at the helm.
The Founder Factor: When Visionaries Leave
The market’s reaction to leadership changes appears particularly pronounced when founder-CEOs depart, as witnessed with Xponential’s Geisler. Research indicates that founder departures can fundamentally alter investor perceptions, especially when the founder was viewed as the driving force behind the company’s vision and strategy.
Lucid Group provides a compelling recent example. When CEO Peter Rawlinson – a founder and the technical visionary behind the company – announced his departure in early 2025, Lucid’s stock initially rose on strong production forecasts before reversing course and dropping nearly 15% as investors processed the leadership change.
Bank of America’s equity team promptly downgraded Lucid from Neutral to Underperform and dramatically cut their price target from $3 to $1, describing Rawlinson’s exit as a “significant loss” given his central role in product development. Analysts expressed concern that without its founder-CEO, Lucid’s innovation might slow and consumer demand could soften, since the company had been “highly dependent on his services.”
By contrast, some founder departures are welcomed by investors. When Unity Software’s controversial CEO John Riccitiello resigned in October 2023 following backlash over a botched pricing policy, the company’s stock jumped 6.5% in pre-market trading. In this case, investors viewed the leadership change as removing an obstacle to rebuilding customer trust and stabilizing the business.
Planned vs. Unplanned Transitions: The Preparation Factor
The circumstances surrounding leadership changes significantly influence market reactions. Planned transitions with clear succession strategies typically generate less volatility than abrupt departures.
GameStop’s sudden firing of CEO Matt Furlong in June 2023, with no permanent replacement named, triggered a 20% after-hours stock plunge. The lack of succession planning and ambiguity around the company’s strategic direction contributed to the sharply negative investor response.
Conversely, when ride-hailing company Lyft announced that co-founders Logan Green and John Zimmer would step aside for veteran David Risher in 2023, the stock rose approximately 3% after hours. Analysts noted that Lyft “needed to do something to begin rebuilding investor trust,” and the planned transition to an experienced leader was viewed positively, albeit cautiously.
Similarly, Morgan Stanley’s long-time CEO James Gorman signaled a planned exit and established a clear succession process, resulting in only a mild stock dip on the announcement. The market appreciated the orderly transition, demonstrating how thoughtful succession planning can mitigate negative sentiment.
Institutional Investor Responses to Leadership Changes
The Optimist Fund’s complete divestment from Xponential in the aftermath of Geisler’s resignation highlights the decisive actions institutional investors increasingly take in response to leadership changes. This pattern extends across multiple sectors as investment firms develop more sophisticated approaches to evaluating leadership transition risks.
Recent filings show that Tiger Global Management significantly reduced its position in Peloton Interactive following executive restructuring, decreasing its holding by approximately 60%. The firm cited “evolving market dynamics and strategic uncertainties” as factors in its decision, particularly noting concerns about the company’s transition away from its founder-led model.
Conversely, some institutional investors see leadership changes as opportunities. ValueAct Capital significantly increased its Spotify position following the streaming giant’s leadership reorganization, viewing the company’s streamlined decision-making structure and enhanced operational focus as positive developments.
Similarly, Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square Capital Management increased its stake in Howard Hughes Corporation during that company’s CEO search, viewing the interim leadership structure as an opportunity rather than a risk. Pershing Square’s position increase represented a $275 million additional investment, bringing their total stake to approximately 18% of outstanding shares.
Analyst Perspective: The Expert View on Leadership Transitions
Financial analysts play a crucial role in interpreting leadership changes for investors, and their recommendations often amplify market movements following executive transitions.
When Walgreens CEO Rosalind Brewer resigned in late August 2023 after a difficult tenure, the pharmacy chain’s stock fell about 2.2%. Evercore analyst Elizabeth Anderson noted that while the “timing took many by surprise, the event itself was not” given Walgreens’ ongoing challenges. She observed that with the company pivoting deeper into healthcare services, it “makes sense to search for new leadership” with relevant experience.
Similarly, after Dave & Buster’s CEO departure, analysts highlighted the increased uncertainty surrounding the company’s strategic direction. The intensified scrutiny from analysts contributed to the sharp stock decline as investors absorbed both the leadership change and the professional assessment of its implications.
Recent research from Morgan Stanley’s cross-sector analysis indicates that periods of leadership transition often create both risks and opportunities for institutional investors. Their report notes that “while markets typically react to leadership changes with short-term volatility, our research suggests these periods often precede significant value creation.”
Discussion about this post